Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Alameda Census Tracts
  • County : Alameda Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days County: Alameda

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days County: Alameda

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Alameda has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days City/Place: Livermore

18.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.3%), Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate County: Alameda

236.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 236.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 371.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 437.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), Alameda has a value of 236.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (236.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (263.9).
Prior Value
(263.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Alameda

14.9
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Alameda has a value of 14.9.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (14.9) is greater  than the previously measured value (13.8).
Prior Value
(13.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose County: Alameda

13.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 13.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Alameda has a value of 13.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (13.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Alameda

16.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 16.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.4), Alameda has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (16.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.4).
Prior Value
(15.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose County: Alameda

12.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.1), Alameda has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (12.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.1).
Prior Value
(11.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Alameda

97.8
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 97.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 141.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 183.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (143.7), Alameda has a value of 97.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(143.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (97.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (94.3).
Prior Value
(94.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Alameda

3.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 3.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Alameda has a value of 3.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (3.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.4).
Prior Value
(1.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Alameda

30.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 30.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Alameda has a value of 30.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (30.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.9).
Prior Value
(5.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Alameda

39.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 39.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (48.3), Alameda has a value of 39.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (39.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.2).
Prior Value
(36.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Alameda

1.1
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 1.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7), Alameda has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (1.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.4).
Prior Value
(1.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Alameda

7.6
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 7.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Alameda has a value of 7.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (7.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.9).
Prior Value
(5.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents County: Alameda

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents County: Alameda

1.0
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 1.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Alameda has a value of 1.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (1.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.3).
Prior Value
(1.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Opioid Prescription Patients

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Opioid Prescription Patients

Value
Compared to:

Opioid Prescription Patients County: Alameda

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients County: Alameda

1.7%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (1.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate County: Alameda

Current Value:

Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate County: Alameda

220.9
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 220.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 330.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 440.1.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (220.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (218.8).
Prior Value
(218.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily County: Alameda

Current Value:

Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily County: Alameda

5.0
Residents on >90 MMEs of Opioids per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 5.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.3), Alameda has a value of 5.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (5.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.2).
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate

Value
Compared to:

Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate County: Alameda

Current Value:

Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate County: Alameda

1,537.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (1,275.4), Alameda has a value of 1,537.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1,275.4 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (1,537.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,642.7).
Prior Value
(1,642.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate City/Place: Livermore

933.7
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 933.7 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1,416.3 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1,623.1.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (1,537.2), Livermore has a value of 933.7 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(1,537.2)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,275.4), Livermore has a value of 933.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,275.4 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (933.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (927.0).
Prior Value
(927.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Value
Compared to:

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Alameda

Current Value:

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Alameda

4.5%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 4.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (4.9%), Alameda has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5%), Alameda has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (4.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.4%).
Prior Value
(4.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force City/Place: Livermore

3.6%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.9%), Livermore has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5%), Livermore has a value of 3.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (3.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.6%).
Prior Value
(3.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Alameda

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Alameda

48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 48.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 48.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Alameda has a value of 48.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Alameda has a value of 48.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent City/Place: Livermore

53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (48.9%), Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Housing & Homes

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Severe Housing Problems County: Alameda

Current Value:

Severe Housing Problems County: Alameda

23.3%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 23.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (25.7%), Alameda has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Alameda has a value of 23.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alameda (23.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.3%).
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Alameda

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Alameda

9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Alameda has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Alameda has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.4%), Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Alameda

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Alameda

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Alameda has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Alameda has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level County: Alameda

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level County: Alameda

80.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 80.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 80.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Alameda has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Alameda has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alameda value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

87.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (80.6%), Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Alameda

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Alameda

9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Alameda has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Alameda has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

People Living Below Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level City/Place: Livermore

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.2%), Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Economy / Poverty

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Youth not in School or Working County: Alameda

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Alameda

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Alameda has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alameda has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Alameda has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Alameda has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alameda value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working City/Place: Livermore

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working City/Place: Livermore

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.6%), Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Healthy Alameda County