Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Alameda Census Tracts
  • County : Alameda Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

18.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.3%), Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Livermore has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Substance Use Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
933.7
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 933.7 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1,416.3 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1,623.1.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (1,537.2), Livermore has a value of 933.7 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(1,537.2)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,275.4), Livermore has a value of 933.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,275.4 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (933.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (927.0).
Prior Value
(927.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Cancer

5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Livermore has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Livermore has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

84.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (79.0%), Livermore has a value of 84.1% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Livermore has a value of 84.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy Past 5 Years and FOBT Past 3 Years, Colonoscopy Past 10 Years, or FOBT Past Year

69.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (67.7%), Livermore has a value of 69.8% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Livermore has a value of 69.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
60.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (61.0%), Livermore has a value of 60.8% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Livermore has a value of 60.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

74.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 74.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 74.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (71.6%), Livermore has a value of 74.0% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Livermore has a value of 74.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

City/Place: Livermore Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

84.6%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (79.5%), Livermore has a value of 84.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Diabetes

8.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.6%), Livermore has a value of 8.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (8.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Diabetes Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Diabetes Hospitalization Rate

791.1
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 791.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 771.6 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 994.4.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (879.6), Livermore has a value of 791.1 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(879.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,017.7), Livermore has a value of 791.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,017.7)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (791.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (831.3).
Prior Value
(831.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
17.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 17.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 17.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (21.5%), Livermore has a value of 17.2% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Livermore has a value of 17.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Livermore has a value of 17.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Children with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children with a Disability

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.0%), Livermore has a value of 2.7%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Livermore has a value of 2.7%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.7%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.0%), Livermore has a value of 3.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Livermore has a value of 3.4%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Livermore has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Disability

8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.5%), Livermore has a value of 8.9%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Livermore has a value of 8.9%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Livermore has a value of 8.9%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.3%), Livermore has a value of 2.8%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Livermore has a value of 2.8%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Livermore has a value of 2.8%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.3%), Livermore has a value of 1.9%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Livermore has a value of 1.9%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Livermore has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Persons with a Vision Difficulty

1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (1.8%), Livermore has a value of 1.7%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Livermore has a value of 1.7%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Livermore has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.9%), Livermore has a value of 4.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Livermore has a value of 4.0%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Livermore has a value of 4.0%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
21.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (21.9%), Livermore has a value of 21.2% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (21.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.6%).
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
59.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 59.4% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 59.4% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (61.1%), Livermore has a value of 59.4% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(61.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Livermore has a value of 59.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

94.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (92.8%), Livermore has a value of 94.8% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (94.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (91.5%).
Prior Value
(91.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults without Health Insurance

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (7.2%), Livermore has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Livermore has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Avoidable Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
1,978.2
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 1,978.2 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,957.6 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,623.1.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3,740.6), Livermore has a value of 1,978.2 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3,740.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3,950.2), Livermore has a value of 1,978.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3,950.2)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (1,978.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1,974.2).
Prior Value
(1,974.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

7.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.9%), Livermore has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (7.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City/Place: Livermore Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children with Health Insurance

98.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (97.3%), Livermore has a value of 98.7% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(97.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Livermore has a value of 98.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Livermore has a value of 98.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (98.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (98.8%).
Prior Value
(98.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
74.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (65.6%), Livermore has a value of 74.5%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(65.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Livermore has a value of 74.5%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Livermore has a value of 74.5%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (74.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (70.5%).
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (20.7%), Livermore has a value of 11.7%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Livermore has a value of 11.7%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Livermore has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (11.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
95.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (93.0%), Livermore has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(93.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Livermore has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Livermore has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
97.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 97.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 97.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (96.4%), Livermore has a value of 97.9% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Livermore has a value of 97.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Livermore has a value of 97.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
96.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (94.6%), Livermore has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Livermore has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Livermore has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Experienced a Stroke

2.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Livermore has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.4%), Livermore has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Livermore has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
68.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (72.1%), Livermore has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Livermore has a value of 68.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Heart Disease

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Heart Disease

6.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.9%), Livermore has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Cholesterol Test History

85.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 85.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 85.9% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (85.6%), Livermore has a value of 85.9% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(85.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Livermore has a value of 85.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Congesitve Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Current Value:
232.4
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 232.4 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 174.7 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 222.4.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (195.9), Livermore has a value of 232.4 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(195.9)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (174.1), Livermore has a value of 232.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(174.1)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (232.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (173.1).
Prior Value
(173.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Coronary Heart Disease Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
213.4
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 213.4 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 231.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 266.5.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (232.8), Livermore has a value of 213.4 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(232.8)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (247.2), Livermore has a value of 213.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(247.2)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (213.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (263.8).
Prior Value
(263.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
32.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 32.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 32.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (34.1%), Livermore has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(34.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Livermore has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Stroke Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Stroke Hospitalization Rate

165.6
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 165.6 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 196.0 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 214.7.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (191.3), Livermore has a value of 165.6 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(191.3)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (215.5), Livermore has a value of 165.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(215.5)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (165.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (180.0).
Prior Value
(180.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 19.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (15.9%), Livermore has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Livermore has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Current Value:
9.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.9%), Livermore has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (9.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (13.5%), Livermore has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Livermore has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Severe Mental Illness Related Emergency Department Visits

Current Value:
1,365.8
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 1,365.8 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 387.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 487.4.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2,285.9), Livermore has a value of 1,365.8 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2,285.9)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (320.0), Livermore has a value of 1,365.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(320.0 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (1,365.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (293.9).
Prior Value
(293.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
7.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.9%), Livermore has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (7.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

33.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 33.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,471 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 33.1% which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (30.9%), Livermore has a value of 33.1% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(30.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Livermore has a value of 33.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

42.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 42.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 42.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (38.2%), Livermore has a value of 42.2% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Livermore has a value of 42.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Disability

30.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (30.8%), Livermore has a value of 30.5%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Livermore has a value of 30.5%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Livermore has a value of 30.5%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (11.1%), Livermore has a value of 12.9%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Livermore has a value of 12.9%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Livermore has a value of 12.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.7%), Livermore has a value of 7.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Livermore has a value of 7.4%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Livermore has a value of 7.4%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Livermore has a value of 6.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Livermore has a value of 6.4%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Livermore has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
14.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (16.1%), Livermore has a value of 14.2%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Livermore has a value of 14.2%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Livermore has a value of 14.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

7.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,418 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6.7%), Livermore has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Livermore has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Visited a Dentist

68.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 68.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 68.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (63.1%), Livermore has a value of 68.3% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(63.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Livermore has a value of 68.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Children who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children who Visited a Dentist

90.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (89.7%), Livermore has a value of 90.7% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(89.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (90.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (95.6%).
Prior Value
(95.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Acute Preventable Hospitalizations

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Acute Preventable Hospitalizations

430.0
Per 100,000 population
(2009-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 430.0 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 436.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 471.5.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (447.7), Livermore has a value of 430.0 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(447.7)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (500.63), Livermore has a value of 430.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(500.63)
The Alameda County value is compared to the CA State value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Arthritis

18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (17.8%), Livermore has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Livermore has a value of 18.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Kidney Disease

2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.7%), Livermore has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Livermore has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Chronic Preventable Hospitalizations

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Chronic Preventable Hospitalizations

600.6
Per 100,000 population
(2009-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 600.6 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 618.35 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 739.53.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (787.5), Livermore has a value of 600.6 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(787.5)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (786.98), Livermore has a value of 600.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(786.98)
The Alameda County value is compared to the CA State value.

City/Place: Livermore Hypertension Hospitalizations

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Hypertension Hospitalizations

917.7
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 917.7 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 917.7 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1,011.0.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (986.4), Livermore has a value of 917.7 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(986.4)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1,234.8), Livermore has a value of 917.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1,234.8)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (917.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,006.8).
Prior Value
(1,006.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Self-Inflicted Injury Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
112.5
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 112.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 92.2 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 116.7.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (103.1), Livermore has a value of 112.5 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(103.1)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (115.5), Livermore has a value of 112.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(115.5)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (112.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (115.8).
Prior Value
(115.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who are Sedentary

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Livermore has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Motor Vehicle Crash Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
538.2
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 538.2 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 718.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 830.7.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (809.3), Livermore has a value of 538.2 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(809.3)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (747.3), Livermore has a value of 538.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(747.3)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (538.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (567.4).
Prior Value
(567.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Unintentional Injury Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
5,179.3
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 5,179.3 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6,274.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7,155.2.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (6,749.6), Livermore has a value of 5,179.3 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(6,749.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6,531.7), Livermore has a value of 5,179.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6,531.7)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (5,179.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5,251.1).
Prior Value
(5,251.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Asthma

16.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.8%), Livermore has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (16.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with COPD

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with COPD

4.2%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (4.0%), Livermore has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Livermore has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults with Current Asthma

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (8.6%), Livermore has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Livermore has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Asthma Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
935.8
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 935.8 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 481.8 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 661.5.
Alameda County Cities/Places
(2012-2014)
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2,355.1), Livermore has a value of 935.8 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2,355.1)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (498.7), Livermore has a value of 935.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(498.7 in 2012-2014)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (935.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (270.8).
Prior Value
(270.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children and Teens with Asthma

16.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.1%), Livermore has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (16.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults who Smoke

4.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.4%), Livermore has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (4.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

City/Place: Livermore Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
2.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (2.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Adults Who Are Obese

27.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Livermore has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Children who are Overweight for Age

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children who are Overweight for Age

11.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.3%), Livermore has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (11.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City/Place: Livermore Obesity-Related Hospitalizations

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Obesity-Related Hospitalizations

341.9
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 341.9 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 342.3 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 422.9.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (367.3), Livermore has a value of 341.9 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(367.3)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (396.8), Livermore has a value of 341.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(396.8)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 CA State value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (341.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (348.2).
Prior Value
(348.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Teens who are Overweight or Obese

19.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (24.4%), Livermore has a value of 19.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (19.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.1%).
Prior Value
(36.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

92.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (89.4%), Livermore has a value of 92.3% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(89.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (92.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.6%).
Prior Value
(88.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

95.4%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (94.6%), Livermore has a value of 95.4% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.

City/Place: Livermore Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Insufficient Sleep

28.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (29.9%), Livermore has a value of 28.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Livermore has a value of 28.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

City/Place: Livermore Life Expectancy

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Life Expectancy

82.0
Years
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (82.0), Livermore has a value of 82.0.
Alameda, CA County Value
(82.0)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (82.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.0).
Prior Value
(82.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Older Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

86.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (79.3%), Livermore has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(79.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (86.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.4%).
Prior Value
(85.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City/Place: Livermore Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

9.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.0%), Livermore has a value of 9.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
11.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (13.3%), Livermore has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Livermore has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Assault Emergency Department Visit Rate

Current Value:
152.5
Per 100,000 population
(2012-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to Alameda County Cities/Places, Livermore has a value of 152.5 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 234.9 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 305.6.
Alameda County Cities/Places
The distribution is based on data from Alameda County cities and census designated places. Alameda County cities and census designated places are approximated using zip codes.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (422.2), Livermore has a value of 152.5 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(422.2)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (322.6), Livermore has a value of 152.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(322.6)
The Alameda County value is compared to the 2013 California State value
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (152.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (183.1).
Prior Value
(183.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Average Household Size

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Average Household Size

2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.80), Livermore has a value of 2.80.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.80)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Livermore has a value of 2.80.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Livermore has a value of 2.80.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Foreign Born Persons

19.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (33.3%), Livermore has a value of 19.0%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Livermore has a value of 19.0%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Livermore has a value of 19.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Veteran Population

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Veteran Population

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (3.4%), Livermore has a value of 5.4%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Livermore has a value of 5.4%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Livermore has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children in Single-Parent Households

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (19.0%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore People 65+ Living Alone

21.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 21.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 21.6% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,328 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (22.6%), Livermore has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Livermore has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Livermore has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Mean Travel Time to Work

31.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 31.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,265 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 31.3 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (32.6), Livermore has a value of 31.3 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(32.6)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Livermore has a value of 31.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Livermore has a value of 31.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.6%), Livermore has a value of 2.5% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Livermore has a value of 2.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Livermore has a value of 2.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

City/Place: Livermore Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Workers who Drive Alone to Work

65.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 65.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,454 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 65.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (54.7%), Livermore has a value of 65.8% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(54.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Livermore has a value of 65.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Livermore has a value of 65.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Workers who Walk to Work

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (2.8%), Livermore has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Livermore has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Livermore has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,474 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,799 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (61.3%), Livermore has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Livermore has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Livermore has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
67.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 67.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 67.4% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (63.6%), Livermore has a value of 67.4% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(63.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Livermore has a value of 67.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Livermore has a value of 67.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Size of Labor Force

48,509
Persons
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (48,509) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48,489).
Prior Value
(48,489)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
3.6%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.9%), Livermore has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5%), Livermore has a value of 3.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (3.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.6%).
Prior Value
(3.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
35.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (43.2%), Livermore has a value of 35.2%.
Alameda, CA County Value
(43.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Livermore has a value of 35.2%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Livermore has a value of 35.2%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.8%), Livermore has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Livermore has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Livermore has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Homeownership

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Homeownership

70.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 56.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (51.0%), Livermore has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Livermore has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Livermore has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Median Household Gross Rent

$2,482
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of $2,482 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,597 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,072.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,102 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($2,229), Livermore has a value of $2,482 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
($2,229)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Livermore has a value of $2,482 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Livermore has a value of $2,482 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$838
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of $838 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $656 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $833.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,179 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($888), Livermore has a value of $838 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($888)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Livermore has a value of $838 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Livermore has a value of $838 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$3,701
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of $3,701 which is in the worst 25% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,244 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,800.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,098 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($3,547), Livermore has a value of $3,701 which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
($3,547)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Livermore has a value of $3,701 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Livermore has a value of $3,701 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

38.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (31.9%), Livermore has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(31.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Livermore has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Livermore has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

City/Place: Livermore Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Overcrowded Households

3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (7.4%), Livermore has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Livermore has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Livermore has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City/Place: Livermore Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:
53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (48.9%), Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is higher and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Livermore has a value of 53.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Gender Pay Gap

$0.73
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($0.78), Livermore has a value of $0.73 which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
($0.78)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($0.77), Livermore has a value of $0.73 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($0.77)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.73), Livermore has a value of $0.73.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore ($0.73) is greater and better than the previously measured value ($0.61).
Prior Value
($0.61)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Income Inequality

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Income Inequality

0.419
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.419 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.422 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.463.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.419 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.404 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.452.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.469), Livermore has a value of 0.419 which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.469)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Livermore has a value of 0.419 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Livermore has a value of 0.419 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Median Household Income

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Median Household Income

$152,590
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of $152,590 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $81,483 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $59,688.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,291 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of $152,590 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $61,726 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,125.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,419 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($122,488), Livermore has a value of $152,590 which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($122,488)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Livermore has a value of $152,590 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Livermore has a value of $152,590 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Per Capita Income

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Per Capita Income

$67,965
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of $67,965 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,615 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,434.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,448 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of $67,965 which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $31,134 while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $24,781.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,512 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value ($60,193), Livermore has a value of $67,965 which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
($60,193)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Livermore has a value of $67,965 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Livermore has a value of $67,965 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (22.7%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.4%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(35.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5%), Livermore has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (9.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Children Living Below Poverty Level

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.4%), Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Livermore has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (14.8%), Livermore has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.3%), Livermore has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Livermore has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (7.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City/Place: Livermore Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Families Living Below Poverty Level

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (5.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Livermore has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
20.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (25.7%), Livermore has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Livermore has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Livermore has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (20.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.5%).
Prior Value
(23.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (10.4%), Livermore has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Livermore has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Livermore has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
87.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (80.6%), Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Livermore has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (20.5%), Livermore has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (27.6%), Livermore has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(27.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (28.4%), Livermore has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Livermore (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore People Living Below Poverty Level

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (9.2%), Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Livermore has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

City/Place: Livermore Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

City/Place: Livermore Youth not in School or Working

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (0.6%), Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(0.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Livermore has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

City/Place: Livermore

Value
Compared to:

City/Place: Livermore People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
48.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 48.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 48.7% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (50.9%), Livermore has a value of 48.7% which is lower and worse.
Alameda, CA County Value
(50.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Livermore has a value of 48.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Livermore has a value of 48.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City/Place: Livermore People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
94.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Livermore has a value of 94.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Livermore has a value of 94.2% which is in the best 50% of cities/places. Cities/places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while cities/places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Alameda, CA County Value (89.2%), Livermore has a value of 94.2% which is higher and better.
Alameda, CA County Value
(89.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Alameda County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Livermore has a value of 94.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Livermore has a value of 94.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Livermore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Healthy Alameda County